Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Alana Smith vs Gail Falkenberg Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Smith vs Falkenberg analysis and find out who is favored!
Alana Smith vs Gail Falkenberg Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Smith 1 - 0 Falkenberg
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Smith has won 46.74% of points on their second serve, while Falkenberg has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Smith, in recent form, has won 52.36% of their opponent's second serve points, while Falkenberg has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.85% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Smith has saved 58.03% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Falkenberg has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Smith has won 47.54% of matches played (W/L 29/ 32), with Falkenberg winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Smith has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 46/ 44), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 6/ 8). Falkenberg has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Smith has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50.88% of matches (W/L 29/ 28), where as Falkenberg has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Smith winning 1 times and Falkenberg being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Smith winning 2 and Falkenberg winning 0. The last match between Smith and Falkenberg was at the W60 Vero Beach, 16-01-2023, Q1 round, Clay with Alana Smith getting the victory 6-0 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:37:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Smith and Falkenberg have played a deciding set 0 times, with Smith winning 0 times and Falkenberg 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Smith winning 0, and Falkenberg 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Smith has played against opponents with an average rank of 194.1 while Falkenberg has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Smith has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Falkenberg has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Smith has converted 46.2% of breakpoint opportunities, and Falkenberg has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
403
Rank
397
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
1012
Rank
360
High
77
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
49% (80-82)
Career Total W/L
9% (12-121)
39% (9-14)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Alana Smith vs Gail Falkenberg For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Smith VS Falkenberg
Sportsbook
Offer
Smith VS Falkenberg H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Alana Smith | Gail Falkenberg |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 0 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:37:0 | 0:37:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (18/27) | 52% (16/31) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 100% (18/18) | 19% (3/16) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 67% (6/9) | 20% (3/15) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (6/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 81% (25/31) | 11% (3/27) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Smith VS Falkenberg H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-0 |
Stats 
Alana Smith
Player
Gail Falkenberg
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve %
52%
(
16 of
31)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
100%
(
18 of
18)
1st Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
3 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
49
Total Points Won
9
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Alana Smith | Gail Falkenberg |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 39% (9/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 42% (22/30) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (231/247) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 67 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.31 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 73 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:41 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 167.7 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (910/1569) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (586/910) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (308/659) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (73/158) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (646/1556) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 41% (9/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (9/22) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (10/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (13/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Alana Smith Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Alana Smith
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Alana Smith
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alana Smith
Player
Destanee Aiava
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
97)
8
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
5
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
45 of
57)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
24 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
88
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alana Smith
Player
Danielle Daley
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
42%
(
24 of
57)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
10
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
8 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Unknown Player
Player
Alana Smith
60%
(
71 of
119)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
84)
4
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
2
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
54%
(
26 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
48 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
84)
102
Total Points Won
101
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Melany Solange Krywoj
Player
Alana Smith
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
52 of
93)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-4 5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alana Smith
Player
Louise Kwong
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Victoria Flores
Player
Alana Smith
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Flores
Player
Alana Smith
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liv Hovde
Player
Alana Smith
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
86)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
41 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Gail Falkenberg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Basant Kaur
Player
Gail Falkenberg
54%
(
14 of
26)
1st Serve %
61%
(
19 of
31)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
100%
(
14 of
14)
1st Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
2 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
48
Total Points Won
9
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alana Smith
Player
Gail Falkenberg
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve %
52%
(
16 of
31)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
100%
(
18 of
18)
1st Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
3 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
49
Total Points Won
9
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Smith Vs Falkenberg Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Smith are available here and Falkenberg photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
